Blockchain Network Congestion: What It Is, Why It Happens, and How to Solve It

What Is Blockchain Network Congestion?

Blockchain network congestion is a common problem that affects many cryptocurrencies and decentralized applications. It occurs when the number of transactions submitted to the network exceeds its capacity to process them in a timely manner. This can result in increased transaction fees, slower transaction confirmations, and poor user experience. In this article, we will explain what causes blockchain network congestion, how it affects different blockchain platforms, and what solutions are being proposed to address it.

What Causes Blockchain Network Congestion?

Blockchain network congestion is caused by a mismatch between the supply and demand of transaction processing on the network. The supply of transaction processing is determined by the network’s design parameters, such as the block size, the block time, and the consensus mechanism. The demand for transaction processing is determined by the number and size of transactions that users send to the network.

When the demand for transaction processing exceeds the supply, the network becomes congested. This means that there are more transactions waiting to be confirmed than the network can handle at any given time. These transactions are stored in a temporary queue called the mempool, where they wait until they are selected by miners or validators to be included in a new block.

The selection process of transactions from the mempool depends on various factors, such as the transaction fee, the priority, and the age of the transaction. Typically, miners or validators will choose transactions that offer higher fees or have higher priority over those that offer lower fees or have lower priority. This creates a market for transaction fees, where users can compete for faster confirmations by paying higher fees.

However, when the network is congested, even paying higher fees may not guarantee fast confirmations. This is because there may be too many transactions with similar or higher fees competing for the limited space in each block. In this case, some transactions may remain stuck in the mempool for a long time, or even get dropped if they are not confirmed within a certain period.

How Does Blockchain Network Congestion Affect Different Platforms?

Blockchain network congestion can affect different platforms in different ways, depending on their design and use cases. Here are some examples of how congestion can impact some of the most popular blockchain platforms:

• Bitcoin: Bitcoin is the first and most widely used cryptocurrency that uses a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism to secure its network. Bitcoin has a fixed block size of 1 megabyte (MB), which limits its throughput to about 7 transactions per second (TPS). Bitcoin also has a variable block time of about 10 minutes, which means that it takes an average of 10 minutes to confirm a new block. These design choices make Bitcoin more secure and decentralized, but also more prone to congestion when there is high demand for transactions. Bitcoin has experienced several episodes of congestion in its history, such as in 2017 when the popularity of BRC-20 tokens caused a spike in transaction activity and fees. To address this issue, Bitcoin has implemented several scaling solutions, such as Segregated Witness (SegWit), which increases the effective block size by separating signature data from transaction data; and Lightning Network, which enables fast and cheap off-chain transactions through payment channels.
• Ethereum: Ethereum is the second-largest cryptocurrency and the leading platform for smart contracts and decentralized applications (DApps). Ethereum uses a proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism called Ethereum 2.0 to secure its network. Ethereum has a dynamic block size that adjusts according to the network’s gas limit, which is the maximum amount of computation that can be performed in each block. Ethereum also has a fast block time of about 15 seconds, which means that it takes an average of 15 seconds to confirm a new block. These design choices make Ethereum more scalable and flexible than Bitcoin, but also more vulnerable to congestion when there is high demand for computation on the network. Ethereum has faced several challenges with congestion in its history, such as in 2020 when the popularity of decentralized finance (DeFi) applications caused a surge in gas fees and usage. To address this issue, Ethereum has implemented several scaling solutions, such as Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups, which enable faster and cheaper on-chain transactions through layer-2 protocols; and Polygon Network, which enables interoperable and scalable sidechains through layer-2 protocols.
• Binance Smart Chain: Binance Smart Chain (BSC) is a blockchain platform that runs parallel to Binance Chain, which is the native blockchain of Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume. BSC uses a delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism to secure its network. BSC has a large block size of 32 MB, which allows it to process up to 300 TPS. BSC also has a fast block time of about 3 seconds, which means that it takes an average of 3 seconds to confirm a new block. These design choices make BSC more efficient and user-friendly than Bitcoin and Ethereum, but also more centralized and less secure. BSC has not experienced significant congestion in its history, as it has enough capacity to handle the current demand for transactions on the network. However, BSC may face scalability issues in the future if its user base and activity grow exponentially. To address this issue, BSC has proposed several scaling solutions, such as cross-chain communication and sharding, which enable parallel processing and interoperability among different blockchains.

What Solutions Are Being Proposed to Solve Blockchain Network Congestion?

Blockchain network congestion is a complex and multifaceted problem that requires a combination of technical and economic solutions. Some of the most common solutions that are being proposed or implemented by different platforms are:

• Increasing the block size: Increasing the block size is a simple and straightforward solution that can increase the throughput and reduce the fees of the network. However, increasing the block size also comes with trade-offs, such as increasing the storage and bandwidth requirements for nodes, reducing the decentralization and security of the network, and creating compatibility issues with older software versions.
• Reducing the block time: Reducing the block time is another simple and straightforward solution that can increase the speed and reduce the latency of the network. However, reducing the block time also comes with trade-offs, such as increasing the orphan rate and the risk of forks, reducing the finality and stability of the network, and creating synchronization issues among nodes.
• Implementing layer-2 protocols: Implementing layer-2 protocols is a more advanced and sophisticated solution that can increase the scalability and efficiency of the network without compromising its security and decentralization. Layer-2 protocols are protocols that operate on top of the base layer (layer-1) of the blockchain, such as payment channels, sidechains, rollups, and plasma. These protocols enable faster and cheaper transactions by moving some or all of the computation off-chain, while still relying on the base layer for security and settlement.
• Adopting sharding: Adopting sharding is another advanced and sophisticated solution that can increase the scalability and performance of the network without compromising its security and decentralization. Sharding is a technique that splits the network into smaller and independent units called shards, each with its own state, transactions, and consensus mechanism. This allows parallel processing and increased throughput on the network, while still maintaining interoperability and consistency among shards.

Conclusion

Blockchain network congestion is a common problem that affects many cryptocurrencies and decentralized applications. It occurs when the number of transactions submitted to the network exceeds its capacity to process them in a timely manner. This can result in increased transaction fees, slower transaction confirmations, and poor user experience.

Blockchain network congestion is caused by a mismatch between the supply and demand of transaction processing on the network. The supply of transaction processing is determined by the network’s design parameters, such as the block size, the block time, and the consensus mechanism. The demand for transaction processing is determined by the number and size of transactions that users send to the network.

Blockchain network congestion can affect different platforms in different ways, depending on their design and use cases. Some platforms are more prone to congestion than others due to their inherent trade-offs between scalability, security, and decentralization.

Blockchain network congestion can be solved by a combination of technical and economic solutions. Some of these solutions include increasing the block size, reducing the block time, implementing layer-2 protocols, and adopting sharding.

Blockchain network congestion is a challenge that requires constant innovation and improvement from developers, users, and stakeholders. By understanding its causes, effects, and solutions, we can better appreciate the potential and limitations of blockchain technology.

Stay tuned to CoinCarp Social Media and Discuss with Us:

Twitter |Telegram |Reddit |Discord